Sunday, June 12, 2011

Mexico’s Descent in the Inferno


Taken from Global Research

In May 2011, Mexican investigators uncovered another mass clandestine grave with dozens of mutilated corpses; bringing the total number of victims to 40,000 killed since 2006 when the Calderon regime announced its “war on drug traffickers”. Backed by advisers, agents and arms, the White House has been the principal promotor of a ‘war’ that has totally decimated Mexico ’s society and economy.

If Washington has been the driving force for the regime’s war, Wall Street banks have been the main instruments ensuring the profits of the drug cartels. Every major US bank has been deeply involved in laundering hundreds of billions of dollars in drug profits, for the better part of the past decade.

Mexico ’s descent into this inferno has been engineered by the leading US financial and political institutions, each supporting ‘one side or the other’ in the bloody “total war” which spares no one, no place and no moment in time. While the Pentagon arms the Mexican government and the US Drug Enforcement Agency enforces the “military solution”, the biggest US banks receive, launder and transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to the drug lords’ accounts, who then buy modern arms, pay private armies of assassins and corrupt untold numbers of political and law enforcement officials on both sides of the border.

Mexico’s Descent in the Inferno

Everyday scores, if not hundreds, of corpses – appear in streets and or are found in unmarked graves; dozens are murdered in their homes, cars, public transport, offices and even hospitals; known and unknown victims in the hundreds are kidnapped and disappear; school children, parents, teachers, doctors and businesspeople are seized in broad daylight and held for ransom or murdered in retaliation. Thousands of migrant workers are kidnapped, robbed, ransomed, murdered and evidence is emerging that some are sold into the illegal ‘organ trade’. The police are barricaded in their commissaries; the military, if and when it arrives, takes out its frustration on entire cities, shooting more civilians than cartel soldiers. Everyday life revolves around surviving the daily death toll; threats are everywhere, the armed gangs and military patrols fire and kill with virtual impunity. People live in fear and anger.

The Free Trade Agreement: The Sparks that lit the Inferno

In the late 1980’s, Mexico was in crisis, but the people chose a legal way out: they elected a President, Cuahtemoc Cardenas, on the basis of his national program to promote the economic revitalization of agriculture and industry. The Mexican elite, led by Carlos Salinas of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) chose otherwise and subverted the election: The electorate was denied its victory; the peaceful mass protests were ignored. Salinas and subsequent Mexican presidents vigorously pursued a free trade agreement (NAFTA) with the US and Canada , which rapidly drove millions of Mexican farmers, ranchers and small business people into bankruptcy. Devastation led to the flight of millions of immigrant workers. Rural movements of debtors flourished and ebbed, were co-opted or repressed. The misery of the legal economy contrasted with the burgeoning wealth of the traffickers of drugs and people, which generated a growing demand for well-paid armed auxiliaries as soldiers for the cartels. The regional drug syndicates emerged out of the local affluence.

In the new millennium, popular movements and a new electoral hope arose: Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO). By 2006 a vast peaceful electoral movement promised substantial social and economic reforms to ‘integrate millions of disaffected youth’. In the parallel economy, the drug cartels were expanding and benefiting from the misery of millions of workers and peasants marginalized by the Mexican elite, who had plundered the public treasury, speculated in real estate, robbed the oil industry and created enormous privatized monopolies in the communication and banking sectors.

In 2006, millions of Mexican voters were once again denied their electoral victory: The last best hope for a peaceful transformation was dashed. Backed by the US Administration, Felipe Calderon stole the election and proceeded to launch the “War on Drug Traffickers” strategy dictated by Washington .

The War Strategy Escalates the Drug War: The Banking Crises Deepens the Ties with Drug Traffickers

The massive escalation of homicides and violence in Mexico began with the declaration of a war on the drug cartels by the fraudulently elected President Calderon, a policy pushed initially by the Bush Administration and subsequently strongly backed by the Obama – Clinton regime. Over 40,000 Mexican soldiers filled the streets, towns and barrios – violently assaulting citizens - especially young people. The cartels retaliated by escalating their armed assaults on police. The war spread to all the major cities and along the major highways and rural roads; murders multiplied and Mexico descended further into a Dantesque inferno. Meanwhile, the Obama regime ‘reaffirmed’ its support for a militarist solution on both sides of the border: Over 500,000 Mexican immigrants were seized and expelled from the US ; heavily armed border patrols multiplied. Cross border gun sales grew exponentially .The US “market” for Mexican manufactured goods and agricultural products shrank, further widening the pool for cartel recruits while the supply of high powered weapons increased. White House gun and drug policies strengthened both sides in this maniacal murderous cycle: The US government armed the Calderon regime and the American gun manufacturers sold guns to the cartels through both legal and underground arms sales. Steady or increasing demand for drugs in the US – and the grotesque profits derived from trafficking and sales--- remained the primary driving force behind the tidal wave of violence and societal disintegration in Mexico .

Drug profits, in the most basic sense, are secured through the ability of the cartels to launder and transfer billions of dollars through the US banking system. The scale and scope of the US banking-drug cartel alliance surpasses any other economic activity of the US private banking system. According to US Justice Department records, one bank alone, Wachovia Bank (now owned by Wells Fargo), laundered $378.3 billion dollars between May 1, 2004 and May 31, 2007 (The Guardian, May 11, 2011). Every major bank in the US has served as an active financial partner of the murderous drug cartels – including Bank of America, Citibank, and JP Morgan, as well as overseas banks operating out of New York , Miami and Los Angeles , as well as London .

While the White House pays the Mexican state and army to kill Mexicans suspected of drug trafficking, the US Justice Department belatedly slaps a relatively small fine on the major US financial accomplice to the murderous drug trade, Wachovia Bank, spares its bank officials from any jail time and allows major cases to lapse into dismissal.

The major agency of the US Treasury involved in investigating money laundering, the Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, deliberately ignored the blatant collaboration of US banks with drug terrorists, concentrating almost their entire staff and resources on enforcing sanctions against Iran . For seven years, Treasury Undersecretary Stuart Levey used his power as head of the Department for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence to pursue Israel ’s phony “war on terrorism” against Iran , rather than shut down Wachovia’s money-laundering operations with the Mexican drug terrorists. In this period of time an estimated 40,000 Mexican civilian have been killed by the cartels and the army.

Without US arms and financial services supporting both the illegitimate Mexican regimes and the drug cartels – there could be no “drug war”, no mass killings and no state terror. The simple acts of stopping the flood of cheap subsidized US agriculture products into Mexico and de-criminalizing the use and purchase of cocaine in the US would dry up the pool of ‘cartel soldiers’ from the bankrupted Mexican peasantry and the cut back the profits and demand for illegal drugs in the US market.

The Drug Traffickers, the Banks and the White House

If the major US banks are the financial engines which allow the billion dollar drug empires to operate, the White House, the US Congress and the law enforcement agencies are the basic protectors of these banks. Despite the deep and pervasive involvement of the major banks in laundering hundreds of billions of dollars in illicit funds, the “court settlements” pursued by US prosecutors have led to no jail time for the bankers. One court’s settlement amounted to a fine of $50 million dollars, less than 0.5% of one of the banks (the Wachovia/Wells Fargo bank) $12.3 billion profits for 2009 (The Guardian, May 11, 2011). Despite the death of tens of thousands of Mexican civilians, US executive branch directed the DEA, the federal prosecutors and judges to impose such a laughable ‘punishment’ on Wachovia for its illegal services to the drug cartels. The most prominent economic officials of the Bush and Obama regimes, including Summers, Paulson, Geithner, Greenspan, Bernacke et al, are all long term associates, advisers and members of the leading financial houses and banks implicated in laundering the billions of drug profits.

Laundering drug money is one of the most lucrative sources of profit for Wall Street; the banks charge hefty commissions on the transfer of drug profits, which they then lend to borrowing institutions at interest rates far above what – if any – they pay to drug trafficker depositors. Awash in sanitized drug profits, these US titans of the finance world can easily buy their own elected officials to perpetuate the system.

Even more important and less obvious is the role of drug money in the recent financial meltdown, especially during its most critical first few weeks.

According to the head of United Nation’s Office on Drugs and Crime, Antonio Maria Costa, “In many instances, drug money (was)… currently the only liquid investment capital…. In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system’s main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor…interbank loans were funded by money that originated from drug trade and other illegal activities… (there were) signs that some banks were rescued in that way.” (Reuters, January 25,2009. US edition). Capital flows from the drug billionaires were key to floating Wachovia and other leading banks. In a word: the drug billionaires saved the capitalist financial system from collapse!

Conclusion

By the end of the first decade of the 21st century, it has become clear that capital accumulation, at least in North America, is intimately linked to generalized violence and drug trafficking. Because capital accumulation is dependent on financial capital, and the latter is dependent on the industry profits from the multi-hundred-billion dollar drug trade, the entire ensemble is embedded in the ‘total war’ over drug profits. In times of deep crises the very survival of the US financial system – and through it, the world banking system – is linked to the liquidity of the drug “industry”.

At the most superficial level the destruction of Mexican and Central American societies – encompassing over 100 million people – is a result of a conflict between drug cartels and the political regimes of the region. At a deeper level there is a multiplier or “ripple effect” related to their collaboration: the cartels draw on the support of the US banks to realize their profits; they spend hundreds of millions on the US arms industry and others to secure their supplies, transport and markets; they employ tens of thousands of recruits for their vast private armies and civilian networks and they purchase the compliance of political and military officials on both sides of the borders

For its part, the Mexican government acts as a conduit for US Pentagon/Federal police, Homeland Security, drug enforcement and political apparatuses prosecuting the ‘war’, which has put Mexican lives, property and security at risk. The White House stands at the strategic center of operations – the Mexican regime serves as the front-line executioners.

On one side of the “war on drugs” are the major Wall Street banks; on the other side, the White House and its imperial military strategists and in the ‘middle’ are 90 million Mexicans and 40,000 murder victims and counting.

Relying on political fraud to impose economic deregulation in the 1990’s (neo-liberalism), the US policies led directly to the social disintegration, criminalization and militarization of the current decade. The sophisticated narco-finance economy has now become the most advanced stage of neo-liberalism. When the respectable become criminals, the criminals become respectable.

The issue of genocide in Mexico has been determined by the empire and its “knowing” bankers and cynical rulers.

Listo el estado para operativo conjunto de seguridad, asegura gobernador


A partir de mañana y hasta el 19 de junio se realizará en cada una de las 32 entidades del país el primer operativo conjunto de seguridad, ante lo cual el gobernador de Chihuahua, César Duarte, aseguró que el estado está listo para comenzar con estas acciones.

De esta manera, en todo el país participarán 310 mil efectivos entre policías estatales, de investigación y ministeriales, con el fin de atacar entre el 65% y el 70% de los delitos que más preocupan a los ciudadanos en el país, tal como lo anunció el jefe de Gobierno del Distrito Federal, Marcelo Ebrard, quien se reunió con los gobernadores y secretarios de seguridad, entre ellos César Duarte.

Duarte Jáquez dijo que ya todos los elementos que están listos para participar de manera conjunta para atender rápidamente los delitos y asegurar que se cumpla la ley. Además, se enfocarán a detener a probables responsables de incumplimiento de algún mandato judicial, desarticular bandas criminales y verificar vehículos con vidrios polarizados o sin placas.

Calderón culpa a armerías de EU por miles de muertes en México



En el marco de su visita a Estados Unidos, el Presidente lanza un 'yo acuso' a la industria armamentista y la responsabiliza de equipar a cárteles.

El presidente Felipe Calderón responsabilizó a la industria armamentista de Estados Unidos por las miles de muertes que están ocurriendo en México.

“¿Y por qué sigue entonces este negocio de las armas? Lo digo abiertamente: por el lucro, por las ganancias que le produce a la industria armamentista norteamericana este asunto. Yo acuso a la industria armamentista norteamericana de miles de muertes que están ocurriendo en México”, arremetió en una reunión con inmigrantes.

Calderón argumentó que, para frenar el flujo de armas que son adquiridas por los criminales mexicanos de manera indiscriminada en las tiendas de este país, no se requiere un cambio legislativo, pero sí volver a las restricciones que operaban en la administración del gobierno de William Clinton.

“Exijo que se ponga orden en ese tema”, agregó Calderón alzando la voz.

A la par, el mandatario respondió a los reclamos de la Caravana por la Paz: “No se le puede pedir a un Presidente que no se meta.”

En el inicio de su visita a Estados Unidos este fin de semana, el presidente Felipe Calderón Hinojosa atribuyó los homicidios violentos ocurridos en México a la industria armamentista de este país.

“¿Y por qué sigue entonces este negocio de las armas? Yo lo digo abiertamente: por el lucro, por las ganancias que le produce a la industria armamentista norteamericana este asunto.

“Yo acuso a la industria armamentista estadunidense de las miles de muertes que están ocurriendo en Mexico”, arremetió en una reunión con migrantes mexicanos.

“Exijo que se ponga orden en ese tema”, agregó Calderón alzando la voz.

Argumentó que, para frenar ese flujo de armas ilegales que son adquiridas por los criminales mexicanos de manera indiscriminada en las tiendas de este país, no se requiere un cambio legislativo, pero sí al menos volver a las restricciones que operaban en la administración de William Clinton.

“Y no se trata de reformar la Constitución de Estados Unidos siquiera; tan sólo con que restablecieran lo que puso el presidente Clinton alguna vez, la ley que prohibía la venta de armas de asalto, con eso iríamos de gane en muchas cosas”, alegó.

Calderón recordó que este tema lo expuso en mayo del año anterior en el Capitolio, porque las armas que aquí se venden, dijo, bajo la denominada Segunda Enmienda (que garantiza el derecho de los estadunidenses a la defensa), no están llegando a las manos de los “buenos ciudadanos americanos”.

Calderón señaló que dichas armas son manejadas por manos criminales “que hoy están matando a mexicanos, pero que un día pueden matar, como de hecho ocurrió con el agente (Jaime) Zapata, a ciudadanos americanos también”, alertó.

Vecino del mayor consumidor

El Presidente mexicano criticó también el hecho de que aquí el consumo de drogas “sigue a todo lo que da”.

De inmediato añadió que “no sólo eso”, sino que “hay otro factor que, creo, entre todos debemos denunciar: el negocio de las armas en Estados Unidos”.

Detalló el jefe del Ejecutivo federal que desde cuando inició su sexenio se han “arrebatado a los criminales” 104 mil armas y que más de la mitad son rifles de asalto, como los AR-15 y los AK-47, así como 11 millones de cartuchos y más de diez mil granadas.

“¿Y saben qué? Hemos demostrado y lo han reconocido las autoridades estadunidenses, que por lo menos 85 por ciento de esas armas, más de ocho de cada diez, fueron vendidas en una tienda de armas en Estados Unidos”, planteó.

Se preguntó si dicha venta debía explicarse por la Segunda Enmienda estadunidense y él mismo respondió:

“Ojalá así fuera. Yo respeto el derecho y la Constitución de Estados Unidos, y en muchas cosas me parece admirable.

“Pero la verdad, y como dije, a muchos representantes (aunque) no les gustó, lo dije en el Congreso de Estados Unidos en mayo del año pasado: esas armas no están yendo a las manos de buenos ciudadanos americanos”, continuó.

Pidió a los migrantes analizar cómo a partir de que la ley contra las armas de asalto dejó de aplicarse en 2004, puede verse “claramente cómo la violencia empezó a crecer desde 2005” en México.

“Y por supuesto que tomó la espiral hacia arriba, durante estos últimos seis años”, subrayó Felipe Calderón.

Insistió entonces en que “tienen que tomarse medidas, porque esto no es sólo un problema de México, sino esto es un problema de corresponsabilidad (con Estados Unidos)”.

Calderón Hinojosa vinculó la gravedad del problema de seguridad a la vecindad con Estados Unidos.

“El hecho de que vivamos al lado del mayor consumidor de droga en el mundo y que todo mundo quiera venderle droga a través de nuestra puerta o nuestra ventana y que, además, el amigo mismo le venda armas a todos los criminales, ése es el meollo y el problema de lo que estamos viviendo”, consideró.

Una política armamentista

Estados Unidos prevé exportar 46 mil 100 millones de dólares en equipos militares este año fiscal, 45% más que el ejercicio pasado, informó el viernes pasado una agencia del Pentágono:

-El director de la Agencia de Defensa, Seguridad y Cooperación de Estados Unidos (DSCA), William Landay, apuntó que incluso Washington será incapaz de surtir todos los pedidos.

-“Tenemos un exceso de 13 mil casos activos con más de 165 países e instituciones”, indicó Landay.

-Calculó que, de procesarse todas las solicitudes, el Pentágono ganaría unos 327 mil millones de dólares adicionales.

-Detalló que esto se debe a la creciente demanda de aviones no tripulados estadunidenses para tareas de combate y vigilancia.

-Entre 2005 y 2010, la agencia ha entregado armas y equipos militares por valor de 96 mil millones de dólares a países de todo el mundo, según Landay.

Aceptan que 70% de armas viene de allá

-También el viernes el diario estadunidense The Wall Street Journal reportó que Estados Unidos es la fuente de al menos 70% de las 29 mil 284 armas incautadas por México entre 2009 y 2010.

-Indicó que el reporte parece confirmar por primera vez el señalamiento de legisladores republicanos de que Rápido y Furioso, de la Oficina de Alcohol, Tabaco, Armas de Fuego y Explosivos (ATF), no logró impedir que las armas acabaran en poder de narcotraficantes en México.

-Los legisladores aducen que la operación permitió que presuntos traficantes compraran más de dos mil 500 armas en EU y podría haber alimentado el tráfico que la ATF se supone impediría.

Ningún mexicano “vino de gorra”: Calderón

En un mensaje a líderes migrantes, el presidente Felipe Calderón aseguró que México está cambiando y aunque reconoció que aún no se generan todos las fuentes de trabajo requeridas y que éstas son “mal pagadas o bajamente pagadas”, la tasa de desempleo es sólo de 5%, cuando Estados Unidos reporta una de casi 10%.

En una escuela para adultos, a la que acudieron unos 600 mexicanos que aquí radican, acompañado por Margarita Zavala y la canciller Patricia Espinosa, el Ejecutivo federal reivindicó los logros de los gobiernos panistas e hizo un reconocimiento público al ex presidente Vicente Fox por haber impulsado el Seguro Popular que dio paso al proyecto de conseguir antes de 2012 la cobertura universal en salud.

Insistió en comparar la recuperación económica después de la recesión de 2009 con lo que sucedía en el pasado.

“Caray, a veces me pregunto cuántos de ustedes salieron de México en una de esas crisis terribles, en algunas de esas devaluaciones en que miles y miles de personas perdieron su casa, su empresa, su negocito, por los errores cometidos en el gobierno.”

“La del 76 o la del 82 o la de 88 o la del 94. En el 82 mucha gente se vino para acá porque no tuvo alternativa”, continuó Calderón.

Comentó que, en lo personal, “Margarita y yo también entramos a mora, porque no pudimos pagar la hipoteca de la casa que habíamos comprado cuando nos casamos, cuando vino la crisis. ¡Cuánta gente se arruinó por eso!”.

En respuesta a la solicitud de un migrante de las primeras generaciones de braceros en el siglo pasado, el Ejecutivo prometió “hacer todo lo posible” para que en el próximo Presupuesto el Congreso asigne los recursos necesarios para liquidar esa vieja deuda.

Luego de aclarar que el problema viene de los años 40 o 50, señaló: “Yo fui el primer Presidente que empezó a pagar esa deuda”.

Calderón se refirió a esas primeras generaciones de migrantes para subrayar que el fenómeno tuvo su origen en la Segunda Guerra Mundial por la demanda de Estados Unidos de mano de obra.

Y en alusión a los pioneros del Programa Bracero sostuvo: “No, aquí nadie vino de gorra, primero invitaron a los trabajadores mexicanos”.

Argumentó que a partir de entonces la prosperidad de este país no puede entenderse sin el trabajo de los migrantes.

Planteó entonces que Estados Unidos “necesita el capital que tiene y necesita la mano de obra que tenemos. Y por esa razón la migración, tiene que entenderse, es un fenómeno económico y social, que no se puede parar por decreto. Tiene que regularse”.

Sostuvo, sin embargo, que él no es partidario ni promotor de la migración, porque con ésta el país pierde a los más audaces y trabajadores, pero admitió que esto se da ante la falta de oportunidades.

Excélsior

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Bilderberg 2011 en Suiza.

From Prison Planet.com

Live video here

Alex Jones and Infowars.com have received inside information regarding the Bilderberg agenda now unfolding in the idyllic Swiss countryside.

According to AFP journalist and legendary Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker’s inside sources, the agenda now under review includes a number of critical issues at the top of the elite’s to-do list. These breakdown as follows:

The elite are concerned that the American Congress may soon turn against the illegal and immoral invasion under humanitarian cover by NATO and the U.S. against the north African dictator Moammar Gaddafi.

As columnist Patrick Buchanan noted yesterday, Congress is rising in opposition to bogus wars launched the by the executive branch in violation of the Constitution.

“Last week, House Speaker John Boehner had to scramble to cobble up a substitute resolution to prevent half his GOP caucus from joining with Democrats to denounce President Obama’s war in Libya as unconstitutional and to demand a total U.S. pullout in 15 days,” Buchanan wrote.

More than a third of House Republicans voted to pull out of the NATO coalition attacking Gaddafi’s forces, in essence forcing a NATO withdrawal from the color revolution engineered civil war in that country.

In January, former oil industry pastor revealed that his inside sources said oil prices will skyrocket – a fait accompli with gas prices at the pump now at historically high levels – as the global elite work behind the scenes to take take down national economies. Williams appeared on the Alex Jones Show to talk about new revelations that deal with the death of the dollar, exploding energy prices, and the engineered onset of order out of chaos revolution worldwide.

The elite now meeting behind closed door in the Switzerland are pushing for a wider war and incalculable suffering in the Middle East.

The money master have long profited from war and mass murder. Nathan Rothschild made a financial bet on Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo and while also funding the Duke of Wellington’s peninsular campaign against Napoleon. The House of Rothschild financed the Prussian War, the Crimean War and the British attempt to seize the Suez Canal from the French and also financed the Mexican War and the Civil War in the U.S.

In addition to worrying about Congress waking up to the Libyan scam, the global elite as also concerned over a diverse liberty movement that has grown exponentially with the help of an open and free internet.

In response, the pocketed pawns in Congress have introduced a raft of bills over the last few months designed to take down the internet and blunt its impact as a medium for alternative news and information.

On April 1, 2009, the Senate introduced two bills, endangering a free and open internet: S. 773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009 and S. 778 to establish a White House cybersecurity czar.

In addition, on September 20, 2010, S. 3804: Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) was introduced.

Early last month, an especially ominous bill was introduced in the Senate. Entitled Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011, PROTECT IP for short, this legislation would use copyright infringement as a smoke screen to take down web domains and institute rolling censorship.

On the international front, the European Commission gave a nod toward implementing theAnti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), a draconian measure that will subvert national sovereignty, trash Net Neutrality, consumer privacy, and civil liberties. In the United States, the corporate media has virtually ignored ACTA, but then key players in the Mockingbird media are often Bilderberg attendees and privy to aspects of the agenda.

The above represent a small sampling of legislation and treaties that will be used to shut down the opposition under the cover of protecting copyright and preventing terrorism.

Hyperventilating over exaggerated threats of cybersecurity, Senator Jay Rockefeller mused during a congressional meeting on cyber crime and terrorism in 2009: “It really almost makes you ask the question would it have been better if we had never invented the internet.”

The globalists are not opposed to the internet, especially as a corporatized money-making instrument. They are, however, opposed to an open, free, and unregulated by government internet where alternative media opposed to their globalist devices are allowed to thrive.

In addition, we can expect minions of the global elite who parade around as our elected representatives and appointed government officials to continue their propaganda efforts to convince the American people that the internet will be used as a terrorist weapon of mass destruction and as such needs to be tightly regulated – for our own safety, of course, and that of the children.

Finally, the Bilderbergers will work on an effort to sucker an already economically besieged American public into further fantastic debt producing bankster bailouts, specifically for Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and other member EU nations sliding toward bankruptcy and social disruption on a monumental scale.

In late 2010, the U.S. Treasury, now operating as a liaison between the government and the bankster owned private Federal Reserve, indicated it was ready to fork over billions more to the European black hole.

“There are obviously some severe market problems,” said a faceless bureaucrat, speaking on condition of anonymity. “In May, it was Greece. This is Ireland and Portugal. If there is contagion that’s a huge problem for the global economy.”

As of late 2010, the IMF, whose biggest single “shareholder” (read: parasitical host) is the United States, has committed 250 billion euros to the bankster engineered black hole.

“Why should American taxpayers be on the hook because a foreign government cannot cover its debts?” asked Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, at a House subcommittee hearing last May.

Because the plan is to take down national sovereignty, impose drastic austerity measures, hold fire sales on national assets, consolidate wealth and power, and use an endless economic crisis as an excuse to usher in world government, a one-world currency, and a sprawling high-tech police state.

Agustin 'The Penguin' Carstens gets big push for IMF chair.


A dozen Latin American countries have thrown their support behind Mexican central banker Agustin Carstens' bid to become the new head of the International Monetary Fund.

The countries expressed support for Carstens “and invite other governments in the Americas to join” them, said Colombian Foreign Minister Maria Angela Holguin, reading out a statement at the general assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS) that concluded here on Tuesday.

The nations, said the statement, are convinced “of the need to promote greater participation of emerging economies in the region” in selecting the replacement of Dominique Strauss-Kahn as head of the world finance body.

The countries backing the 52-year-old Mexican banker were Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Dominican Republic, Uruguay and Venezuela.

Under a tacit agreement, the leadership of the International Monetary Fund has been held by a European since its founding in 1945, while an American has occupied the top job at the World Bank.

Strauss-Kahn resigned last month after being accused of attempting to rape a chambermaid in a New York hotel.

Touting his credentials, Carstens has been on an international tour to promote the bid as his direct rival.

After meetings in Ottawa on Tuesday, Carstens said that Canada's Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney had indicated to him that Canada “would welcome an emerging-market” candidate for the job, but did reveal who they will back for the post.

French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde, has also embarked on a similar mission.

In Beijing on Wednesday, after talks in India that did not yield any public endorsement, Lagarde met with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi, who after their meeting said the race to lead the IMF was “open.” - Sapa-AFP

Friday, June 3, 2011

Carstens critica 'abandono' de FMI a Latinoamérica


"El tratamiento que recibió Argentina para mí fue demasiado fuerte", aseguró Carstens luego de reunirse con el ministro argentino de Economía, Amado Boudou, dentro de su gira para promover su candidatura a dirigir al organismo multilateral.

"Pienso que no es debido en una institución como el FMI haber dejado al garete a un país miembro" , remató durante una rueda de prensa.

"Si yo llegara a ser director gerente, una de las lecciones que aprendí es que no es apropiado dejar que un país miembro se valga por sus propias fuerzas. Siempre debe haber esa flexibilidad para mantener la comunicación, el diálogo, el apoyo" , insistió Carstens, quien llegó a Buenos Aires luego de visitar España y Brasil.

Luego de declarar un cese de pagos de 2001, el mayor de la historia financiera (102.000 millones de dólares) , Argentina se ha negado a aplicar "recetas" del Fondo Monetario, convertido en blanco de duras críticas de los gobiernos del fallecido Néstor Kirchner (2003-2007) y de su esposa y actual mandataria, Cristina Fernández.

Kirchner declaró "la independencia" de Argentina del FMI en enero de 2006, cuando canceló en un solo pago en efectivo la totalidad de las deudas argentinas con el organismo (unos 9 mil 500 millones de dólares) .

"El FMI no se puede olvidar que su misión principal es ayudar a los países a tomar decisiones en momentos difíciles", señaló Carstens.

El gobernador del Banco de México dijo que el Fondo Monetario debería ayudar a Grecia a "tomar decisiones difíciles" .

"Como conocemos bien a los países latinoamericanos, en el manejo de crisis se debe sumar varias medidas, de orden macroeconómico, que ayuden a la sociedad civil a enfrentar estos problemas difíciles, a atender problemas de empleo" , comentó.

"Sobre todo, el FMI tiene que se catalizador para sumar el apoyo de la comunidad financiera internacional", agregó.

Carstens aseguró que una de las motivaciones fundamentales de su candidatura es la voluntad de acabar con la situación de "abandono en que Latinoamérica está en el FMI" .

"Para mí es lamentable que en los primeros tres niveles de la institución no haya ningún representante de Argentina, Brasil ni México. Parece que si uno no da problemas, no le toman en cuenta", señaló.

Su objetivo es "buscar que la voz de países emergentes se oiga más en el FMI, que se vuelva una institución más plural, más abierta. Que se reconozca el avance que han tenido los países emergentes en la economía mundial, que se reconozca que tenemos la capacidad de hacer aportaciones al crecimiento económico del mundo" , afirmó.

"No debemos de olvidarnos que hoy por hoy la economía mundial está creciendo fundamentalmente por los países emergentes. Esos logros se tienen que reconocer y valorar" añadió Carstens, quien compite con la ministra de Economía de Francia, Christine Lagarde

Aseguró que no ve "ninguna situación desbordada en ninguno de los países" de América Latina ni "ningún foco rojo que implique alguna corrección mayor en sus políticas públicas" .

"Yo le daría un voto de confianza a lo que se está haciendo en la región" , aseguró Cartens luego de rechazar las "recetas universales" porque "cada país necesita una atención personal" .

Amado Boudou admitió que coincide en muchos puntos con Carstens, pero no quiso adelantar a quien apoyará el Gobierno argentino.

China, North Korea Ties Highlighted By Kim Jong Il's Visit




Picture: North Korean leader Kim Jong Il checking out some fresh meat. Tyrants will be tyrants.

BEIJING — Visits to Beijing this week by top officials from North Korea, Myanmar, and Iran are spotlighting China's cozy ties with nations widely shunned for human rights abuses and threatening behavior.

North Korea's supreme leader Kim Jong Il apparently conferred Wednesday with Chinese President Hu Jintao in a meeting underscoring the influence economic powerhouse China has with Kim's ostracized regime, which struggles to feed its people.

On Thursday, Beijing will host a visit from Myanmar President Thein Sein, a former general and prime minister in the military junta that handed power to a nominally civilian government at the end of March. Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi stopped in Beijing as part of commemorations of four decades of diplomatic ties.

To many observers, such ties tarnish Beijing's self-image as a responsible rising power.

But to China, they represent a political kinship in rejecting Western-style democracy as well as the economic benefits of trade with partners whose markets are shunned by the West yet wide open for Chinese investment.

China's communist leaders are themselves accused of violating rights and locking up its critics and have little patience for Western accusations against similar regimes.

"China views a number of countries in the world as in alliance in not having democracy or sharing Western human rights concepts," said Michael Davis, a law professor and Chinese politics expert at Chinese University of Hong Kong. "It helps mobilize their legitimacy argument that the Western approach is not the only one."

China's Foreign Ministry has refused to confirm Kim's presence in China, although Premier Wen Jiabao has said China invited him to study, and hopefully adopt, Beijing's market-oriented reforms.

Kim's trip reportedly began Friday, and South Korean media said he arrived in Beijing on Wednesday. A motorcade believed to be carrying Kim and his delegation arrived Wednesday evening at China's legislature, where Hu usually receives official visitors.

China faces a tough sell getting the North to change its centrally planned economy. North Korea has abandoned previous reform attempts and there is little indication that the ailing, 69-year-old Kim or his son and anointed successor Kim Jong Un view them any more favorably now.

However, exchanges with China have become even more important than before as the North's relations with the rest of the world deteriorate. South Korea and the United States have halted food shipments and the conservative government in Seoul has suspended crucial trade, costing Pyongyang tens of millions of dollars in annual earnings. The U.N. and other groups also have enacted sanctions to punish the country for violating nuclear agreements.

Iran for its part is under four sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to stop uranium enrichment – an activity that can make both nuclear fuel and fissile warhead material. Like North Korea, Iran's nuclear and missile programs are seen as a threat to its neighbors, while Myanmar's crackdown on political opponents and ethnic minorities has seen it widely shunned by the international community.

Beijing, with its avowedly noninterventionist foreign policy, takes a different approach, emphasizing the need for continued dialogue and economic engagement. China also has a huge interest in avoiding the kind of unrest that could be unleashed at its borders if one of the regimes in North Korea or Myanmar should fall.

But while these states may seem to have warm relations, they don't necessarily share deep trust.

North Korea and Myanmar may resent their dependence on China and often seem to want to go their own way, as shown in their unwillingness so far to undertake the economic reforms China is pitching, said Ian Storey of the Singapore-based Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, a think tank that focuses on social, political, economic and security trends.

"China's influence over these countries tends to be greatly exaggerated," Storey said.